Or is every female celebrity supposed to hit that magical one-number weight in-between and stay there with no variation?
I think they'd say yes. Please to remain size 2, but do not show us your bones.
People like Keira Knightley and, oh, say Kate Hudson, and a few other tiny girls I can't think of, who have always been very thin, even on the too-thin side of thin -- they don't bother me as much as the ones who've clearly lost weight, like Kate Bosworth and Lindsay Lohan and Nicole Richie (who, my god, looks as though she can't even stand up under her own power).
Keira has always been thin - it's just the bone protrusion I've noticed of late. It just seemed like she used to have some curves, even slender ones, and it seems she doesn't have so much now. Or maybe it was just that her chest seemed concave in that gold dress; I don't really know.
I think the gold dress had a lot to do with it. The cut was not flattering and appeared to be the dress where everyone noticed how tiny she is. But, I don't think she's lost weight.
The gold dress was incredibly unflattering, or the cameraguy was on the warpath, or something -- I think whenever I've seen her mentioned in those too-thin articles, it's been with shots of that dress. I do remember her being a little curvier when she was doing "King Arthur," but I think it was muscle more than anything.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
I think they'd say yes. Please to remain size 2, but do not show us your bones.
People like Keira Knightley and, oh, say Kate Hudson, and a few other tiny girls I can't think of, who have always been very thin, even on the too-thin side of thin -- they don't bother me as much as the ones who've clearly lost weight, like Kate Bosworth and Lindsay Lohan and Nicole Richie (who, my god, looks as though she can't even stand up under her own power).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)